As the world becomes more urbanized, the demand for landscape
trees increases. In the United States, this demand is being driven by local ordinances governing
tree replacement, acknowledged desires for landscapes with tree canopies,
and high mortality rates of transplanted trees. Along with
increased demand for landscape trees, comes an increase in the number and/or
size of nurseries producing landscape trees. This also increases
the demand for water for tree production. To date there is little
useful information on tree water requirements, especially for trees of
2-inch (5cm) trunk caliper or larger. In order to be better managers
of their irrigation water usage, nurseries need simple, accurate
method of determining tree water requirements on a day to day or at least a
week to week basis. This knowledge does not exist for landscape trees,
yet is required to develop Best Management
Practices for the irrigation of landscape trees. Since the adoption of
soil-less substrates in the late 1960's, overall production of landscape
trees has gradually shifted from in-ground to container production for trees
up to 6-inches(15cm) in caliper. The rate of this shift to container
production has accelerated in the United States over the past decade.
In container production systems, irrigation management is the key for
economically viable tree growth and water conservation. When properly
irrigated, container-grown trees can grow as fast or faster than trees in
the ground (Beeson and Keller, 2003). However, as trees approach
marketable size for the container in which they are grown, they are often
under-irrigated, reducing growth rates and vigor. Reduced vigor leads
to its own problems once trees are transplanted into a landscape.
In landscapes, improper irrigation is the principal cause of transplant
failure. In soils with a high clay content or a subsoil layer
impervious to water, over-irrigation often occurs. In porous and/or
deep soils, under irrigation is the principal cause of tree death.
Thus, knowledge of tree water requirements, based on an easily measured unit
of tree size , and portable to different climates and locations, is
necessary for water conservation during tree production, and for increasing
tree survival after transplanting.
The goal of this project is to determine precisely how much water trees
need in a given situation and the simplest way to determine this.
Adoption of the results from this study would conserve the most water
possible while maintaining economically viable tree growth. Adoption
of these recommendations will become more economically advantageous as the
cost and availability of water, along with the necessity of water
conservation, increases.
With the requirements of portability among locations and ease of scaling
to a tree in question, we set out to measure daily tree transpiration using
suspension lysimeters. Suspension lysimeters are, essentially, in
large scales on which trees are semi-permanently resting. By weighing
a tree throughout each 24 hour day, one can calculate the tree's daily water
loss. The study will be a 5 to 6 year project; 3 tree species are being grown
from liner stage (new seedling or recently rooted cutting) to a 5-inch
(15cm) caliper, in suspension lysimeters. Each lysimeter is monitored
by computer and is being irrigated accordingly based on their daily water
usage. Because of the methodology, the results should also be readily
applicable to in-ground tree production and in landscapes.
Our weighing (or floating) lysimeter (pic 1 & 2) measures weight
based on downward tension applied to a measuring device called a load cell(3).
This load cell then sends a voltage reading to the computer which is
compared to a known range of values and is calculated into weight.
These readings are taken every half hour. Trees are irrigated twice daily
during active growth and once daily in the winter, based on the amount of weight loss, being water loss, due mainly
to transpiration. We also record weather data every
half hour that includes temperature, humidity, rainfall, wind speed & direction,
solar radiation, and reference evapotranspiration(4).
The three species studied in this initial research are the Live Oak (Quercus
Virginiana Mill.;9) for Florida and much
of the Southeast, the 'Nellie R. Stevens' Holly (Ilex cornuta x I.
aquifolium;10) as a more cold tolerant
evergreen species, and the 'Florida Flame' maple( Acer rubrum cv.
Florida Flame;8), a deciduous tree,
representing a very wide geographical distribution of maples. All the trees were grown
from liners initially potted into #7(26.6L) containers. The lysimeter trees'
containers were painted with a root pruning compound
on the inside (Spin Out, Griffin Corp, Valdosta, GA, USA) and covered with aluminum foil on the outside to reduce soil
temperatures(5). Lids were placed on the pots to minimize evaporation
from the soil and to limit rainfall accumulation in the containers. At
appropriate times the trees were, and will continue to be, potted up into larger containers,
eventually resulting in the tree growing in #300 (1140 L) containers.
Lysimeter trees are surrounded with comparable trees to simulate
production conditions(6 & 7). Every three weeks the trees are measured
for height, canopy widths, and trunk caliper. They are fertilized
accordingly with controlled-release prills as a top dressing and irrigated
with micro-irrigation spray stakes in each pot. They
are also pruned and staked as needed to produce a quality tree.
From the data collected, we will develop models that relate tree size and
microclimate data to tree actual transpiration (ET). We anticipate this can be
used to:
-lead to more precise irrigation of trees during
production, both in container and
in-ground
-set irrigation requirements for landscape tree
establishment periods
-justify irrigation rates for Consumptive
Use
Permits
-aid Water Management Districts in the CUP
determination process
AET or Actual Evapotranspiration is, briefly, a measure of the amount of
water loss from the plant due to environmental factors such as temperature,
humidity, wind, rainfall, and solar radiation. Below are graphs that
represent the data that has been collected thus far in our experiment.
To use the graphs you must first know 1) the average caliper of the tree or block of
trees you intend to irrigate and 2) the potential or reference
evapotranspiration (ETo), from the previous day. If you do not
have a weather station at your site that calculates evapotranspiration in
Florida it can be accessed at the Florida Automated
Weather Network, or FAWN, website using
http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/tools/et/et.asp . (In other states, similar
networks have been established. Interested persons should contact
their local Agricultural Extension Agent (if in the United States) or
regional agricultural official to learn of the availability in your
location. Where state or regional networks are available, you will
need to select an appropriate site complimentary to your location.) Here will be a weather summary,
from the various FAWN sites located throughout the state, with ET recorded in
inches. Using this value and the caliper of your tree, refer to the
charts below to find a recommended irrigation value. Adjustments to
these values may be necessary based on the efficiency of your irrigation
system.
First, find your tree's caliper on the bottom of
the graph. Next, go vertically until you find the line corresponding
to your ET value on the right hand side of the graph. Now follow
directly horizontal (do not follow the curve) to the left side of the
graph. This is your
recommended irrigation value for the day.
The goal of this project is to determine precisely how much water trees
need in a given situation and the simplest way to determine this.
Adoption of the results for this study therefore would conserve the most
water possible while maintaining economically viable growth. Adoption
of these recommendations will be economically advantageous as the cost and
availability of water, along with the necessity of water conservation,
increases. The information derived from this project would also
provide a vehicle to accurately assess an operation's CUP request and place
this process on a sound scientific basis.
Maple
Caliper
0-1"
1-2"
2-3"

Oak
0-1"
1-2"
2-3"

Holly
0-1"
1-2"
